Post by account_disabled on Jan 31, 2024 9:10:47 GMT
according to the authors of the study, Francisco Javier Moreno, from the Institute of Public Policies of the CSIC, and María Bruquetas , professor of Political Science at the University of Amsterdam. And right now. Social Security registered 2,500,677 foreign affiliates in December 2022, 12.3% of the total SS affiliates, who with their contributions contribute to the maintenance of pensions, including those of many VOX voting pensioners. 83.3% are in the General Regime and there are 2,050,132. For its part, there are 406,313 from the Self-Employed Regime. If we are so civilized, will we ever have to consider immigrants as people And it is this numerical policy that inspires others. For example, a policy on or for immigration; but, not a policy of, from and for immigrants. However, if we are so civilized, we will someday have to consider immigrants, as people, as political subjects with rights.
We would also have to get rid of another consequence of the numerical obsession: the consideration of immigrants in exclusively economic terms, of usefulness; of its use value. It seems that the only justification for their Phone Number Database permanence among us is that use value: by carrying out work rejected by the natives or their tax contributions. Nobody questions that we can talk about its usefulness. What is questioned is whether the language is exclusively that of its usefulness. And no, the language of dignity, which means considering, as Kant pointed out, that in any situation it is morally obligatory to treat every person, immigrant or not, as an end in themselves and never as a means. The answer to the identity question usually results in a set of disqualifications directed at the immigrant. What fosters fears, easily transformed into hatred In Europe we talk about the convenience of dialogue between different people.
And even the difference is praised. But, suddenly, the different person arrives and we don't know what to do with him. But too often one knows what to do against it. We establish legal regulations, which (il)legalizes their presence. We would have to ask ourselves the question: Can, should, immigration, difference be included in the code of law? Or should we look for another inclusion without seclusion, without exclusion: the language of hospitality? By how we perceive and welcome others, those who are different, our degree of barbarism or civilization can be measured. Language of hospitality , which was practiced and theorized throughout history and in many cultures, especially those bathed by the Mediterranean. I repeat the Mediterranean consciously. For example, in archaic Greek culture, where hospitality was institutionalized. An institution that gave prestige and public recognition to those who practiced it; and discredited those who ignored her.
We would also have to get rid of another consequence of the numerical obsession: the consideration of immigrants in exclusively economic terms, of usefulness; of its use value. It seems that the only justification for their Phone Number Database permanence among us is that use value: by carrying out work rejected by the natives or their tax contributions. Nobody questions that we can talk about its usefulness. What is questioned is whether the language is exclusively that of its usefulness. And no, the language of dignity, which means considering, as Kant pointed out, that in any situation it is morally obligatory to treat every person, immigrant or not, as an end in themselves and never as a means. The answer to the identity question usually results in a set of disqualifications directed at the immigrant. What fosters fears, easily transformed into hatred In Europe we talk about the convenience of dialogue between different people.
And even the difference is praised. But, suddenly, the different person arrives and we don't know what to do with him. But too often one knows what to do against it. We establish legal regulations, which (il)legalizes their presence. We would have to ask ourselves the question: Can, should, immigration, difference be included in the code of law? Or should we look for another inclusion without seclusion, without exclusion: the language of hospitality? By how we perceive and welcome others, those who are different, our degree of barbarism or civilization can be measured. Language of hospitality , which was practiced and theorized throughout history and in many cultures, especially those bathed by the Mediterranean. I repeat the Mediterranean consciously. For example, in archaic Greek culture, where hospitality was institutionalized. An institution that gave prestige and public recognition to those who practiced it; and discredited those who ignored her.